I saw it many times in 2D and it is a great movie. However, I will not participate in James Cameron's shameless scheme to squeeze a few more bucks out of it. The fact that its release coincides with the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the great ship really irks me. It's like Cameron is trying to make money from the misfortune of those poor souls who lost their lives that night.
Viktor is a small town southern boy living in Los Angeles. You can find him on Twitter, writing about pop culture, politics, and comics. He’s the creator of the graphic novel StrangeLore and currently getting back into screenwriting.
7 comments:
I've seen it but I'm not going to sit nearly four hours to see it again in 3D.
I have never seen it, and won't see it in 3D.
They couldn't pay me enough to go see it in 3D.
I saw it many times in 2D and it is a great movie. However, I will not participate in James Cameron's shameless scheme to squeeze a few more bucks out of it. The fact that its release coincides with the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the great ship really irks me. It's like Cameron is trying to make money from the misfortune of those poor souls who lost their lives that night.
It's a good movie that I've watched several times. Being in 3D makes no difference to me.
Never seen Titanic, and don't plan to, even if I didn't think 3D was just a stupid gimmick that should've died with poodle skirts and the Edsel...
Nope.
got the DVD.
Saw it in 2D and hated it in 2D. So no...I won't be lining James Cameron's pockets with more money to see it in 3D. Sorry.
Post a Comment