I've been here two years, guys. And one of the things that I just try to remember is that if we have accomplished 70 percent of what we committed to in the campaign, historic legislation, and we've got 30 percent of it undone — well, that's what the next two years is for, or maybe the next six.
Understandably, everybody has a great sense of urgency about these issues. But one of the things that I constantly want to counsel my friends is to keep the long view in mind. On social issues, something like "don't ask, don't tell." Here, I've got the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff both committed to changing the policy. That's a big deal.
Now, I am also the commander in chief of an armed forces that is in the midst of one war and wrapping up another one. So I don't think it's too much to ask, to say "Let's do this in an orderly way" — to ensure, by the way, that gays and lesbians who are serving honorably in our armed forces aren't subject to harassment and bullying and a whole bunch of other stuff once we implement the policy. I use that as an example because on each of these areas, even those where we did not get some grand legislative victory, we have made progress. We have moved in the right direction.
I agree.
source
4 comments:
Re: the first paragraph... I hope the midterms aren't as ominous as they predict... Give the guy some slack...
V, I do to. As much as I may disagree with the timing of his actions or inactions, he is the president and I do believe given the time, he can accomplish some of what progressives want him to. To expect much more than that of a person in his position, in this political climate, is foolish.
Well said, Sir!
I still think that he can put a stop to the enforcement of the policy while it is under investigation. Why continue to lose solid military personnel to a policy you are in the process of repealing? Until they are sure one way or the other no one should be discharged due to it.
Post a Comment