This is the trial that should never have happened. Hundreds of thousands of Californians contributed blood, sweat, tears and treasures to exercize their core civil rights to respond to the California State Supreme Court decision overturning marriage. That's what that decision did: it didn't expand marriage to more people, it abolished the core idea of what marriage is--the union of male and female--and replaced it with a new judicial definition of marriage, ungrounded in the natural order, in our history, or in our constitution.
So the people responded to this judicial intrusion in the way their constitution guaranteed them the right to do: by collecting hundreds of thousands of signatures to put the issue before the people in November 2008. I was part of that effort. Brian Brown, NOM's president, who is a native Californian, played an even more pivotal role. They told us the effort would be doomed to fail: it was too many signatures, too much money, too little time, and besides we were told "the culture has changed and you'll lose at the ballot box."But we didn't. None of that turned out to be true. More than 7 million Californians, in one of the most liberal states in the country, came together to affirm, once again, that they believe marriage is the union of husband and wife and should not be changed
.
NOM's sacred cow's post as she goes to the closing arguments of the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case
2 comments:
Overturning marriage? I don't re-call anyone's marriages being stopped or nullified when the CA Supreme Court allowed same-sex marriages. I guess I missed that part.
isn't that the trash from fragle rock?
Post a Comment