Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Just some perspective of "Framework" for the Tax Cuts Deal

Yesterday, President Obama talked about the framework for the Tax Cuts deal. Basically, it could mean that the Bush Tax Cuts will be extended for 2 years, but unemployment benefits will be extended for 13 months (the largest extension in history) and a 2% cut in the employee side of the payroll tax for one year, and a some of the expanded tax credits included in the 2009 Recovery Act.

But I wanted to state that this is a "Framework", meaning none of this is set in stone. More changes could come before the unemployment benefits are over (in 3 months). I know folks are upset and mad about this supposed deal, however this deal could help over 150 million people.

Think Progress has the scoop
For comparison’s sake, The Wonk Room has a chart detailing both the number of people (in millions) who benefit from each side’s priorities, as well as the total cost (in billions). Obama’s components of the tax deal (extended unemployment benefits, the payroll tax cut, and the extended credits) will cost $214 billion to aid 156 million people. The Republicans priorities (extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich and cutting the estate tax), meanwhile, will cost $133 billion, but only benefit roughly 4.8 million people.
So, in order to get desperately needed help for the long-term unemployed and to provide the middle-class with tax relief in a weak economy, Obama agreed to tax cuts for a small, wealthy portion of the population that the Republicans were willing to go to the mat for, even if it meant that everyone’s taxes went up if the Bush tax cuts expired. Excluded from this analysis is extension of the broad-based Bush tax cuts, on which everyone agreed. The total package will cost about $900 billion over the next two years, entirely financed through deficit spending.
I hope this helps a little. Again, these are tough decisions. Both groups are not truly winners, but hopefully, the 156 million will get the help they really need.

4 comments:

  1. So the poor, unemployed and desperate get a bone thrown to them for a little over a year to shut them up and the rich fat cats get to keep raking the cash into their bank accounts for 2 more years. Oh yeah that seems fair to me....NOT!
    It's shameless how the Republicans held the unemployed hostage to get what they want and Obama just caved into them again. I've had it! Obama might just as well switch over to the GOP since he's acting just like them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't fair either. That's the ugly side of these compromises

    ReplyDelete
  3. President Obama should have tied the DADT repeal into this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with Stan - President Obama is an ineffective and weak leader who thinks "compromise" means "give the Republicans everything".

    What happened to standing up for your principles even when the going gets tough??? THAT is what a true leader does.

    I'm THROUGH with all the excuses about his job being so difficult. FEEL FREE TO FIND ANOTHER ONE IF YOU CAN'T HACK IT! HELL, if that idiot George W. Bush could do it for 8 years, then surely Obama should be able to handle it. But, unfortunately, it looks like he can't.

    It's a shame - I was so excited when Obama became President. But now I'm even MORE disappointed that he has been so inadequate.

    I am DONE.

    ReplyDelete