The Advocate has a long, but interesting article about Obama's actions towards the LGBT community. And while it speaks on nothing new, I have to wonder... What was the point of the article?
It's good, but it doesn't have much of new material.
I mean, if you have 6 pages tell me something new or provoking. Most of us (bloggers) have already said these things; so really, is this article to putting stuff in perspective or trying boost sales?
Please check it out and let me know what you think.
It was a really long article. For a second I thought I was reading the New Yorker.
ReplyDeleteI think, looking at it in the most idealistic way, it was a reflection piece on the administration so far taking everything in together; because it also brought together the different sides, say the Queerty and non-Queerty side, it potentially serves to bridge the gap a little.
Interesting cover, especially since he was just on the cover a couple of months ago in much better light.
(I seriously have to get on my blog on this before it becomes really old news.)